Judicial Accountability
Understand the mechanisms, concerns, and reforms related to judicial accountability in India.
What is Judicial Accountability?
Judicial accountability refers to the responsibility of judges to uphold integrity, transparency, and independence while being answerable for misconduct.
Key Mechanisms to Ensure Accountability
- Impeachment: Governed by Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the Constitution, and the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968.
- In-House Mechanism (1999): Based on the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life and Bangalore Principles.
- Committee-based Inquiry: Separate committees for SC, HC Judges, and HC Chief Justices to handle complaints.
Concerns with Current System
- Conflict with Judicial Independence: Efforts to ensure accountability may seem to infringe upon judicial independence.
- Complex Impeachment Process: Rarely leads to removal due to political constraints (e.g., Justice Ramaswamy case).
- No Mandatory Asset Disclosure: Judges disclose assets voluntarily; not legally enforceable.
- Limited Checks: Judiciary controls appointments and internal procedures.
- Immunity from Criminal Action: Requires CJI’s prior approval (K. Veeraswami case).
- Restrictions under RTI: Collegium decisions and judges’ personal disclosures often denied.
Suggested Reforms
- Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill: A proposed law to standardize conduct and complaints mechanism.
- National Judicial Commission (NJC): Suggested by Law Commission to include non-judicial members for fairness.
- Permanent Disciplinary Committee: Central level body to review complaints, issue warnings or recommend inquiries.
- Judicial Oversight: Proposal for performance evaluation and regular scrutiny.
Questions and Answers
Q1: What are the constitutional provisions for the impeachment of judges?
A1: Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the Constitution along with the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968 govern the impeachment process.
Q2: What was the outcome of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC)?
A2: NJAC was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2015 for being unconstitutional, reinstating the collegium system.
Q3: Why is there criticism regarding asset disclosure by judges?
A3: Asset disclosure is voluntary and not legally mandated, raising concerns over transparency.
Q4: What is the proposed role of the National Judicial Commission?
A4: NJC would oversee appointments and disciplinary proceedings, with a mix of judicial and non-judicial members.